Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.26 seconds)
Laurel Energetics Private Limited vs Sebi on 5 April, 2017 cites

Commissioner Of Central Excise,Bolpur vs M/S.Ratan Melting & Wire Industries on 14 October, 2008

(l) Learned senior counsel for the Appellants also relied upon the judgments of the Apex Court on the legal validity of the circulars issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, to emphasize the point that informal guidance issued by a regulator is legally binding; (a) Collector of Central Excise, Vadodra vs. Dhiren Chemical Industries reported in (2002) 2 Supreme Court Cases 127; (b) Commissioner of Central Excise, Bolpur vs. Ratan Melting & Wire Industries, Calcutta reported in (2005) 3 Supreme Court Cases 57; (c) Kalyani Packaging Industry vs. Union of India and Another reported in (2004) 6 Supreme Court Cases 719 and (d) Commissioner of Central Excise, Bolpur vs. Ratan Melting & Wire Industries (Civil Appeal No. 4022 of 1999 dated October 14, 2008). Emphasizing the Constitution Bench Judgment at (d) above, it was argued that the circulars and instructions issued by the Board are binding in law on the authorities under the respective statutes.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 145 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Collector Of Central Excise, Vadodra vs M/S. Dhiren Chemical Industries on 12 December, 2001

(l) Learned senior counsel for the Appellants also relied upon the judgments of the Apex Court on the legal validity of the circulars issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, to emphasize the point that informal guidance issued by a regulator is legally binding; (a) Collector of Central Excise, Vadodra vs. Dhiren Chemical Industries reported in (2002) 2 Supreme Court Cases 127; (b) Commissioner of Central Excise, Bolpur vs. Ratan Melting & Wire Industries, Calcutta reported in (2005) 3 Supreme Court Cases 57; (c) Kalyani Packaging Industry vs. Union of India and Another reported in (2004) 6 Supreme Court Cases 719 and (d) Commissioner of Central Excise, Bolpur vs. Ratan Melting & Wire Industries (Civil Appeal No. 4022 of 1999 dated October 14, 2008). Emphasizing the Constitution Bench Judgment at (d) above, it was argued that the circulars and instructions issued by the Board are binding in law on the authorities under the respective statutes.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 203 - Full Document

Kalyani Packaging Industry vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 6 May, 2004

(l) Learned senior counsel for the Appellants also relied upon the judgments of the Apex Court on the legal validity of the circulars issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, to emphasize the point that informal guidance issued by a regulator is legally binding; (a) Collector of Central Excise, Vadodra vs. Dhiren Chemical Industries reported in (2002) 2 Supreme Court Cases 127; (b) Commissioner of Central Excise, Bolpur vs. Ratan Melting & Wire Industries, Calcutta reported in (2005) 3 Supreme Court Cases 57; (c) Kalyani Packaging Industry vs. Union of India and Another reported in (2004) 6 Supreme Court Cases 719 and (d) Commissioner of Central Excise, Bolpur vs. Ratan Melting & Wire Industries (Civil Appeal No. 4022 of 1999 dated October 14, 2008). Emphasizing the Constitution Bench Judgment at (d) above, it was argued that the circulars and instructions issued by the Board are binding in law on the authorities under the respective statutes.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 32 - Full Document
1