Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.28 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Kanti Devi & Ors. on 30 July, 2012
15. Thus, by virtue of Rule 32 of the Claims Tribunal
Rules, 2008, the Claims Tribunal can exercise all the
powers of a Civil Court and in doing so it has to follow
the procedure laid down in the Code. It can be seen that
the scope of power exercisable by the Claims Tribunal
has thus been completely widened by virtue of the Claims
Tribunal Rules, 2008, which means that the Claims
Tribunal can exercise the powers of a Civil Court as laid
down in the Code. Therefore, it would not be correct to
say that the Claims Tribunal is empowered only to order
payment of compensatory costs in cases of vexatious
claims and defences and not otherwise. In other words,
the Claims Tribunal would be competent to award costs
like any other Civil Court under Section 35 read with
Order XXA of the Code and subject to the Rules framed
by the Delhi High Court in this regard.
Section 2 in The Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 [Entire Act]
Section 212 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Suits Valuation Act, 1887 [Entire Act]
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. ... vs Master Manmeet Singh & Ors. on 30 January, 2012
11. The loss of dependency, following Master Manmeet Singh (supra)
will come to `17,03,520/- (7098/- + 25% x 12 x 16).
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Gobald Motor Service Ltd. & Another vs R. M. K. Veluswami & Others on 14 April, 1961
In
Gobald Motor Service Ltd. & Anr. v. R.M.K. Veluswami &
Ors., AIR 1962 SC 1, it was observed as under:-
1