Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.17 seconds)Section 308 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 427 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Prahlad Singh Bhati vs N.C.T., Delhi & Anr on 23 March, 2001
In Prahlad Singh Bhati v. NCT, Delhi [(2001) 4
SCC 280], it was held thus:
Section 452 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Rajesh Ranjan Yadav @ Pappu Yadav vs Cbi Through Its Director on 16 November, 2006
10. I find that the records reveal that the petitioner is a person
with serious criminal antecedents. This Court while dismissing the earlier
application had considered all the relevant facts and had come to the
conclusion that the release of the petitioner on bail was not warranted in
the facts and circumstances. In the instant case, the trial has reached the
B.A.No.4486 OF 2020 7
final stage. The question as to whether the evidence let in by the
prosecution is sufficient enough to arrive at a finding of guilt cannot be
considered by this Court at this stage. Pursuant to directions issued by this
Court the trial court had expedited the trial proceedings and if the accused
cooperate with the proceedings, it can be concluded without any further
delay. As held in Rajesh Ranjan Yadav (supra), grant of bail due to
prolonged incarceration cannot be said to be an absolute rule, because the
grounds of bail must depend upon the contextual facts and circumstances.
The nature of the offence committed, the manner in which it was
committed, the role of the petitioner, his previous antecedents of involving
in not less than 4 serious crimes involving serious offences persuades me to
hold that the petitioner is not entitled to be released on bail.
1