Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.28 seconds)The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961
Section 397 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Arms Act, 1959
Section 392 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 394 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Pritam Singh And Anr. vs The State Of Punjab on 4 November, 1955
136.Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in case 'Pritam Singh Vs. State cited as 1998(1)
JCC (Delhi) 94' where it has been observed that:
"the recovery should be made in presence of independent
witnesses if available and the search and seizure in
SC No.48/2006
State v. Deepak and others 42/44
compliance of section 100(4) of Cr. P. C., would vitiate the
trial."
Sans Pal Singh vs State Of Delhi on 8 January, 1998
135.Moreover, there is no public witnesses to any of the recovery except official
witnesses . Therefore, conviction for the offences u/s 392, 394 and 397 IPC solely
on the testimony of police officials will result into miscarriage of justice. Hon'ble
Supreme Court in case titled as 'Sans Pal Singh Vs. State of Delhi 1999 Cri. L.J.
19' has held that :