Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.49 seconds)
Assistant Executive Engineer (U/S) vs The Guwahati Municipal Corporation And ... on 24 June, 2025
cites
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 409 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 468 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Ajay Kumar Choudhary vs Union Of India Thr Its Secretary & Anr on 16 February, 2015
10. The law with regard to the prolonged suspension and continuation thereof has been
elaborately delt with by the Apex Curt in several judgments. The parameters for continuation
of suspension have been laid down by the Apex Court in Ajay Kumar Choudhury (supra). The
findings of the Apex Court in paragraphs 21 and 22 of the said decision would be relevant in
the facts of this case and are, therefore, extracted below :-
State Of Orissa vs Chandra Nandi on 6 May, 2022
In Chandra Nandi (supra), the Apex Court held
Page No.# 10/15
that every judicial and/or quasi judicial orders are passed by Court/ Tribunal/ Authority
concerned, which decides the list between the parties, must be supported by reasons in
support of its conclusions. The Apex Court held that the parties to the lis, and so also the
Appellate /Revisionary Court, while examining the correctness of the order, is entitled to know
as to on what basis the particular conclusion is arrived at in the order. In the absence of any
discussions, the reasons and the findings it was not possible to know as to what led the
Court/Tribunal/Authority for arriving at the conclusion.
State Of Orissa vs Dhaniram Luhar on 4 February, 2004
In Dhaniram Luhar (supra) the Apex
Court held that the reasons introduce clarity in an order. The reason is the heartbeat of every
conclusion and without the same it becomes lifeless. The reason substitute subjectivity by
objectivity. The emphasis of recording reasons is that if a decision reveals "inscrutable face of
the sphinx", it can, by its silence, render it virtually impossible for the Courts to perform their
appellate function or exercise the power of judicial review in adjudging the validity of the
decision. Right to reason is an indispensable part of a sound judicial system. Reasons at least
should be sufficient to indicate an application of mind to the matter before the Court.