Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.24 seconds)

Maharashtra State Road Trans.Corp. ... vs Casteribe Rajya P. Karmchari ... on 28 August, 2009

14. The petitioners have also prayed for regularization of their service, the prayer for regularization of service cannot be considered as what should be the criteria and whether the petitioners are fulfilling the criteria cannot be examined by this Court as it is disputed question of facts. This can be very well examined by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court who can very well ascertain the facts pleaded by the petitioners and denied by the bank. This issue has come up for consideration before Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation & another Vs. Casteribe Rajya Parivahan Karmchari Sanghatana2, wherein it has been held at paragraph 30 to 36 as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 50 - Cited by 720 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Union Of India vs Rina Devi on 9 May, 2018

10. On the other hand, learned counsel for the bank would submit that the petitioners are daily wage employees, therefore, they cannot claim for regularization as a matter of right and he would further submit that there is no rule or regulation has been placed before this Court to claim regularization of their service. He would further submit that claim of the daily wage employees has come up for consideration before Hon'ble the Supreme Court in case of Union of India Vs. Iimo Devi & another1 and he would refer to paragraph 27 & 28 of the judgment and would pray for dismissal of the writ petitions and would also pray for vacating the interim order as this Court vide its order dated 31.05.2021 has directed that as an interim measure no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioners causing difficulties them to appoint from placement agency for 51 branches 1 2021 SCC OnLine SC 899 Page 20 of 23 which is hampering day to day working of the bank.
Supreme Court of India Cites 45 - Cited by 530 - A K Goel - Full Document
1