Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.94 seconds)
Miss. Sangeeta Kukreja vs M/O Communications on 16 August, 2018 cites

Ms. Madhu Kukreti vs Uoi & Ors. on 11 March, 2011

ii) The respondents have also raised a preliminary objection that the applicant has directly approached this Tribunal by filing the present O.A. without availing alternate remedy available to her. It is proper to say that the order dated 16.06.2015 (Annexure A2) passed by Disciplinary Authority against which departmental appeal lies and the applicant without filing Appeal before the respondents filed the present OA and therefore without exhausting departmental remedies approached this Tribunal OA No. 290/00253/2015 (Ms. Sangeeta Kukreja Vs. UOI & Ors.) 7 directly and so the present OA is not maintainable and deserves to be dismissed.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 4 - S K Misra - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs S.N. Singh Bhati on 3 January, 2018

The said case was further taken up to the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur, and the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur, in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2494/2014 titled UOI & Ors. Vs. S.N. Singh Bhati, dated 04.04.2014, dismissed the WP filed by the respondents and held that the punishment of recovery is illegal, unjust and improper.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 1 - Cited by 14 - P Nandrajog - Full Document

Udai Ram Sharma And Others Etc vs Union Of India And Others on 7 February, 1968

iv) The respondents relied on the judgment passed in OA No.01/2013 titled Shri Ram Sharma Vs. UOI & Ors., decided on 29.09.2014 by Hon'ble C.A.T. Jaipur Bench, wherein it has been held that the departmental proceeding had been conducted by any respondents for imposing minor penalty of recovery of pecuniary loss caused by negligence of any official, in such type of matter, this Tribunal held that there is no illegality and irregularity in the action of the respondents for imposing penalty of recovery from the pay of the official by way of minor punishment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 60 - Cited by 121 - G K Mitter - Full Document

Sh. B.L Verma vs Union Of India Through on 22 May, 2012

vii) The applicant has relied towards the judgment passed in OA No.156/2011 titled Sh. B.L. Verma Vs. UOI & Ors., decided on 22.05.2012, and also to the judgment of Sunil Kumar Joshi Vs. UOI & Ors. passed in OA No.252/2012, decided on 09.08.2013 by the very same Bench, which is annexed at Annexure A16. It is hereby submitted that the punishment order of recovery was quashed and OA was allowed in OA No.252/2012 in the same fraud case (Phalodi fraud case). The Hon'ble High Court has also dismissed the WP No.1695/2014, challenging the order of this Tribunal in the said OA vide judgment dated 20.03.2014. The SLP No.CC No.673/2015, filed by the respondents in the said OA, stands dismissed vide order dated 19.01.2015.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 2 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1