Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.26 seconds)
Vijay Kumar Singh And Others vs Addl. Commissioner (Admn), Ayodhya ... on 3 May, 2024 cites

Smt. Kalawati vs The Board Of Revenue And 6 Others on 5 April, 2022

7. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the writ petition is maintainable before this Court and the alternative remedy to file a suit under Section 144 of the Code, 2006 is not attracted in the case of the petitioners as per exceptions (iv) & (v) carved out by this Court in the case of Hadisul Nisha v. Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Faizabad [(2021) 6 ADJ 176] which has been followed in the case of Kalawati v. Board of Revenue & ors. [(2022) 4 ADJ 578].
Allahabad High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 57 - Y K Srivastava - Full Document

Divisional Manager, United India ... vs Samir Chandra Chaudhary on 14 July, 2005

35. The admission of respondent no. 4 not once but more than once before different authorities including before this Court in the writ petition filed by the respondent no. 4 that his mother predeceased her mother i.e. maternal grandmother of respondent no. 4 and that his case falls under category of (h) of Section 171 (2) of the Act, 1950 and it is best piece of evidence in the light of Section 31 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, though it is not a conclusive proof but they may operate as estoppel. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anr. vs. Samir Chandra Chaudhary [2005(5) SCC 63] has held that admission is the best piece of evidence against the persons making admission by following the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Avadh Kishore Das vs. Ram Gopal [AIR 1979 SC 861] in the backdrop of Section 31 of the Indian Evidence Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 46 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 Next