Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.31 seconds)J. Marathe (Since Deceased Through His ... vs P.V. Kaloke on 16 July, 2004
In J. Marathe (Deceased) v. P.V. Kaloke, 2004 (4) ALL MR
468, a Division Bench of this Court hearing a reference has
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 17:02:27 :::
5 WP 2120/1995
considered whether acquisition of residential premises by a
tenant in a different town can per se be considered as an
acquisition of suitable residential premises within the meaning
of section 13(1)(l) of the Bombay Rent Act.
Bega Begum And Ors vs Abdul Ahad Khan And Ors on 6 October, 1978
Abdul Ahad Khan (supra), both the Courts below, in my view,
clearly misdirected themselves in considering the need to be
not reasonable and bonafide. Even if it is assumed that the
petitioner has the family of only four persons, his desire to have
third room can certainly not be said to be unreasonable or
malafide. Out of the two rooms, one room would be used as
kitchen; the petitioner and his wife would require a bedroom
for themselves and a separate bedroom for the children. This
need cannot be said as unreasonable or malafide.
Section 13 in The Delhi Rent Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
1