Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.25 seconds)
State vs . Mahavir & Ors on 19 March, 2018 cites

State Of Rajasthan vs Mahavir @ Mahavir Prasad on 29 July, 1998

State vs. Mahavir & Ors It is settled proposition of law that the guilt of the accused must be proved beyond reasonable doubt because the law presumes that the accused is innocent. This presumption must prevail until the end unless overcome by strong, clear and compelling evidence. However, in the case in hand the prosecution has failed in establishing the guilt of the accused persons namely Vijay and Ravi Shankar beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, accused persons namely Vijay and Ravi Shankar are ACQUITTED of the crime charged.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 33 - Full Document

Govind And Ors. vs The State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 7 April, 2003

In this regard reference may be made to a Division Bench FIR No.17/2007  Page No.9 of 8 State vs. Mahavir & Ors judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court passed in the case of Govind & Ors vs. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) 104(2003) DLT 510 wherein it was held that "...In cases where ultimate chance of conviction is very bleak or there is no prospect of the case ending in conviction in such cases no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing a criminal prosecution and trial to continue. It is advisable to truncate or snip the proceedings and save valuable time of the courts. The trial should not be continued only for the purpose of formally completing the proceedings to pronounce the conclusion on a future date..........."
Delhi High Court Cites 60 - Cited by 328 - D Bhandari - Full Document
1   2 Next