Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.19 seconds)S.S. Jain Sabha (Of Rawalpindi), Delhi ... vs Union Of India And Ors. on 5 February, 1975
We must, however, remind ourselves that even if a
small part of cause of action arises within the
territorial jurisdiction of the High Court, the same by
itself may not be considered to be a determinative
factor compelling the High Court to decide the matter
on merit. In appropriate cases, the Court may refuse
to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction by invoking
the doctrine of forum conveniens. (See Bhagar Singh
Bagga v. Dewan Jagbir Sawhany, AIR 1941 Cal 670;
Mandal Jalal v. Madanlal, (1945) 49 CWN 357; Bharat
Coking Coal Limited v. M/s. Jharia Talkies and Cold
Storage Pvt. Ltd. (1997) CWN 122; S. S. Jain and Co.
and another v. Union of India and others (1994) CHN
445; M/s. New Horizon Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR
1994 Delhi 126).
M/S. New Horizons Limited And Another vs Union Of India And Others on 15 October, 1993
We must, however, remind ourselves that even if a
small part of cause of action arises within the
territorial jurisdiction of the High Court, the same by
itself may not be considered to be a determinative
factor compelling the High Court to decide the matter
on merit. In appropriate cases, the Court may refuse
to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction by invoking
the doctrine of forum conveniens. (See Bhagar Singh
Bagga v. Dewan Jagbir Sawhany, AIR 1941 Cal 670;
Mandal Jalal v. Madanlal, (1945) 49 CWN 357; Bharat
Coking Coal Limited v. M/s. Jharia Talkies and Cold
Storage Pvt. Ltd. (1997) CWN 122; S. S. Jain and Co.
and another v. Union of India and others (1994) CHN
445; M/s. New Horizon Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR
1994 Delhi 126).
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 20 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
1