Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.26 seconds)
Agarwal vs The Panchayat And Rural Development ... on 5 August, 2024 cites

Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs The International Airport Authority Of ... on 4 May, 1979

In the case of R.D. Shetty Vs. International Airport Authority, reported in (1979) 3 SCC 489, the Supreme Court has held that executive authority must be rigorously held to the standards by which it professes its actions to be judged and it must scrupulously observe those Standards on pain of invalidation of an act in violation of them.
Supreme Court of India Cites 47 - Cited by 2519 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

Pune Municipalc Corp.& Anr vs Harakchand Misirimal Solanki & Ors on 24 January, 2014

In the present case, a procedure has been laid down by the State respondents for communicating the intention of the State respondents to award the contract to the successful bidder. However, prior to the actual awarding of the contract to the successful bidder, the provisions of Clause 30, 31 and 33 etc. has to be followed. These Clauses are meant for the unsuccessful bidders and when a procedure has been made by the State respondents, which cannot be said to be superfluous or redundant, the same would have to be followed. Further, there is nothing in the above Clauses to suggest that the said Clauses would not apply to a bidder, whose bid has been disqualified. The only requirement for its application is that the consultant/bidder's financial bid/proposal was to be opened by the respondent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 1597 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Sibaram Deka vs The State Of Assam And 7 Ors on 31 May, 2023

He also submits that in terms of the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Sibaram Deka vs. State of Assam and 7 others in WA 395/2022, wherein it has been held that when a tenderer participates in a tender process without objection and he is subsequently found to be not successful, a challenge to the selection process is precluded. Such a tenderer cannot be allowed to turn around and contend that the process was unfair, by virtue of the existence of a Clause in the NIT. He also submits that the petitioner has not made a challenge to the Bid Evaluation Committee decision dated 26.06.2024, by which the petitioner's bid was declared disqualified.
Gauhati High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Mehta - Full Document
1