Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.31 seconds)Article 309 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 233 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 234 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 3 in The Majority Act, 1875 [Entire Act]
Jyoti Pershad vs The Administrator For The ... on 21 April, 1961
In support of this contention the petitioner relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in Joyti Pershad v. Administrator for Union Territory of Delhi, AIR 1961 SC 1602.
Article 217 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 24 in The Advocates Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Rameshwar Dayal vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 5 December, 1960
In support of this proposition, the petitioner relied on a decision of the Supreme Court (Rameshwar Dayal v. State of Punjab, AIR 1961 SC 816) holding that the appointment as District Judge of a person whose name was on the roll of Advocates of the East Punjab High Court on the date of his appointment and who had a period of 7 years' practice at the Bar including his period of service in or under the Lahore High Court before partition, was not open to objection under Article 233 of the Constitution. The passage in the judgment on which the petitioner relied is this:
1