Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 108 (4.00 seconds)Section 3 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 45 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002
Vijay Madanlal Choudhary vs Union Of India on 27 July, 2022
174. Thus, in light of the aforesaid principles and
the law enunciated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court
in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary (Supra), this Court
must determine whether the foundational facts
necessary to invoke the presumption under Section
-107-
BBl
2025:JHHC:31170
24 of the PML Act, 2002 have been established by the
respondent/ED.
Section 19 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967
Pankaj Bansal vs Union Of India And Others on 26 July, 2023
The arrest of the said appellant was on 03.10.2023 but the
judgment rendered in the case of Pankaj Bansal Vs.
Union of India & Ors (supra) has been uploaded on
04.10.2023 and as such, the ground was taken not to give
any aid of judgment passed in the case of Pankaj Bansal
Vs. Union of India & Ors. (supra), even though, the
written communication regarding the ground of arrest of
the appellant has not been furnished but the Hon'ble Apex
Court has passed the order that merely because the
judgment in the case of Pankaj Bansal Vs. Union of India
& Ors (supra) has been uploaded on 04.10.2023 but the
said Prabir Purkayastha was arrested on 04.10.2023 while
the judgment passed in the case of Pankaj Bansal Vs.
Union of India & Ors (supra) was delivered on 03.10.2023
and as such the case of Prabir Purkayastha has come
within the ratio of judgment rendered in the case of Pankaj
Bansal Vs. Union of India & Ors (supra) and since, the
written communication was not there, hence, he was
directed to be released on bail, for ready reference, the
relevant paragraph is being quoted as under::