Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.21 seconds)The Tea Act, 1953
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Ronald Wood Mathams vs State Of West Bengal(With Connected ... on 22 April, 1954
(8) The Petitioner's Counsel has also relied upon Ronald v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1954 SC 455 in support of his said contention Justice Venkatarama Iyer speaking for the Bench at page 457(para 10) has observed as follows:--
Section 14 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
Dr. Raghubir Sharan vs The State Of Bihar on 14 March, 1963
I am of the opinion that if an accused is not given reasonable opportunity to prove his case, the Order refusing him to give such opportunity would be improper and illegal and would call for interference by the High Court. The learned Central Government Pleader does not dispute the fact that the High Court has got inherent power under Section 61-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure to pass such Orders as may be necessary to secure the ends of justice. His contention is that this power is an extraordinary power and should be exercised by the High Court only in very exceptional cases. He has brought to my notice a decision of the Supreme Court in Raghubir Saran v. State of Bihar, . The passage relied on by him is as follows:--
Section 2 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
1