Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (0.26 seconds)
The U.O.I. Thru Secretary M.O.D. New ... vs Central Administrative Tribunal ... on 8 December, 2022 cites

Jitendra Kumar Shaw Alias Aditya Kumar vs Union Of India And Others on 2 April, 2012

31. For all the reasons aforestated, the impugned common order of the Tribunal dated 06.10.2016 in O.A. No.330/00881 of 2015 (Alok Kumar and others vs. Union of India and others) (subject matter of Writ-A No.4315 of 2017), O.A. No.330/00532 of 2015 (Vicky Bhalla and others vs. Union of India and others) (subject matter of Writ-A No.11792 of 2017), O.A. No.330/01203 of 2015 (Deepak Maurya vs. Union of India and others) (subject matter of Writ-A No.10250 of 2017), O.A. No.330/01204 of 2015 (Sumit Verma and others vs. Union of India and others) (subject matter of Writ-A No.17851 of 2017), O.A. No.330/00801 of 2016 (Aditya Kumar vs. Union of India and others) (subject matter of Writ-A No.11776 of 2017), O.A. No.330/01044 of 2015 ( Aditya Kumar vs. Union of India and others) (subject matter of Writ-A No.9563 of 2017), cannot be sustained and is hereby quashed. All the writ petitions are allowed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 2 - A Bhushan - Full Document

Jagjit Mohan Singh Bhalla And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 6 May, 1974

31. For all the reasons aforestated, the impugned common order of the Tribunal dated 06.10.2016 in O.A. No.330/00881 of 2015 (Alok Kumar and others vs. Union of India and others) (subject matter of Writ-A No.4315 of 2017), O.A. No.330/00532 of 2015 (Vicky Bhalla and others vs. Union of India and others) (subject matter of Writ-A No.11792 of 2017), O.A. No.330/01203 of 2015 (Deepak Maurya vs. Union of India and others) (subject matter of Writ-A No.10250 of 2017), O.A. No.330/01204 of 2015 (Sumit Verma and others vs. Union of India and others) (subject matter of Writ-A No.17851 of 2017), O.A. No.330/00801 of 2016 (Aditya Kumar vs. Union of India and others) (subject matter of Writ-A No.11776 of 2017), O.A. No.330/01044 of 2015 ( Aditya Kumar vs. Union of India and others) (subject matter of Writ-A No.9563 of 2017), cannot be sustained and is hereby quashed. All the writ petitions are allowed.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 19 - Full Document

Haryana Power Gen.Corp.Ltd.& Ors vs Harkesh Chand & Ors on 7 January, 2013

25. It has been well settled that an apprentice does not have a statutory right to claim an appointment and the employer is not under any statutory obligation to give him employment. However, if the terms of the contract of apprenticeship lay down a condition that on successful completion of apprenticeship an employer would offer him an employment, then it is obligatory on his part to do so. In the absence of such a condition, there is no obligation. The aforesaid principles are supported by the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Haryana Power Generation Corporation Limited and others Vs. Harkesh Chand and others, (2013) 2 SCC 29, (Paragraph 27), as under :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 9 - D Misra - Full Document
1   2 3 Next