Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.33 seconds)Sri. Prabhakar vs Joint Director Sericulture Department on 7 September, 2015
the penalty of stoppage of four increments and thereafter he retired from
service on 30.04.2010. It is not in dispute that the aforesaid penalty of
stoppage of four increments was imposed after holding departmental
inquiry against the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that after he
was acquitted in the year 2010 from the criminal offence, he raised the
industrial dispute and accordingly a reference was made by the
appropriate government. Thus, the facts would suggest that after the
petitioner has undergone the punishment of stoppage of four increments
and his rejection of appeals in the year 2002, he raised an industrial
dispute after period of 8 years. At this stage it would be apposite to refer
to the observations made by the Apex Court in the case of Prabhakar
(supra).
Section 2 in The Delimitation Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Delimitation Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
1