Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (1.21 seconds)Section 61 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Article 12 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 8 in West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Section 24 in The West Bengal Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1949 [Entire Act]
The Limitation Act, 1963
Section 42 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 42 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
R. K. Saxena vs Delhi Development Authority on 30 March, 2001
38. At this stage it would be relevant to point out that the writ petitioners have
performed their part of the contract by making payments pursuant to the
allotment letter as well as demands raised by the respondent authorities from
time to time. Though there may be some delay in making the payments in terms
of the allotment letters but the moment the delayed payments and interest
amounts were accepted by the respondent authorities there has been deemed
extension of time in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in R.K.
Saxena (supra).
Haryana Urban Development Authority vs Vijay Aggarwal on 28 July, 2004
By applying the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Haryana Urban Development Authority (supra) this Court
holds that since the State is not in a position to give possession of plot no. CJ
199A in Sector-II, Salt Lake City, the State must offer an alternate plot at the
original price.