Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Mahindra And Mahindra Ltd vs N.B. Narawade on 22 February, 2005
13. Learned AR of the management - Sh. Pankaj Malik
has submitted that the present complaint U/s 33-A is not
maintainable for want of correct name & description of the
management and that the complainant was not a protected
workman at the time of his dismissal which dismissal was
after conducting a proper enquiry into the charges of serious
misconduct against the workman/ complainant. The
management has already moved an approval application on
31.08.2005 in this regard. The management has not violated
the provisions of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act
and submitted that the complaint, moved on behalf of the
complainant be rejected and relied upon Maghar Singh Vs.
T.K. Industries : FJR: 209-Vol (47) & Mahindra And
Mahindra Ltd. Vs. N.B. Naravade : FLR- Vol-104: 2005-
Page No.1218.
Batra Hospital And Medical Research ... vs Batra Hospital Employees Union And Ors. on 19 May, 2004
26. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case 2004 III
LLJ Delhi P-914 M/s. Batra Hospital and Medical
Research Centre of Sh. Aishi Ram Batra Charitable
Trust Vs. Batra Hospital Emplyees' Union and others has
held as under :-
1