Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.48 seconds)

Gangula Mohan Reddy vs State Of A.P on 5 January, 2010

He has further argued that even if said suicide note is taken as correct, as had been written by the deceased even then no case U/s 306 IPC is made out against the accused, in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court (2010) ACR 203, Gangula Mohan Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and relying upon the said judgment, he has argued that in the present case, there was no instigation or intentional aid on behalf of the accused to cause the death of the deceased and the same does not fall within the definition State Vs. Kamal Dev PS Narela FIR No.08/02 1-18 7 of Section 107 of the Indian Penal Code, which defines abetment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 697 - D Bhandari - Full Document

Mahendra Singh vs State Of M.P on 5 April, 2007

(3) SCC 731, referred to in Sanju @ Sanjay Singh Sengar(supra), is quite apposite. A similar allegation of harassment was made against the in-laws, but that was not considered to fall within the four corners of Section 306 IPC. In that case, there were allegations of beating as well which are absent in the present case. Apart from all this, in the present case, I find that there is no element of mens rea, which is an essential ingredient, even if the allegations, as per the case of the prosecution, were to be taken to be true and correct. In my view, the learned Additional Sessions Judge was entirely wrong in coming to the conclusion that a charge under Section 306 IPC could be framed against the present petitioners.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 261 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1