Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.21 seconds)
Committe Of Management Arya Mahila P G ... vs L I C on 24 April, 2017 cites

Smt. Pushpa Chauhan vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India on 2 February, 2011

The Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that the authority of DESU to collect premium was implied and DESU was an agent of LIC to collect the premium on its behalf. Hon'ble Supreme Court directed LIC to pay to Basanti Devi insurance amount of Rs.50,000/- with interest of 15% p.a.             The learned advocate of the appellant referred to Judgment & Order passed by a co-ordinate bench of this Commission in the matter Appeal No 1152/2001 Smt. Pushpa vs Life Insurance Corporation & others in which the above mentioned case DESU vs Basanti Devihas been referred and drawn  the different conclusion in its Judgement. But we do not agree with that in the light of discussion as above.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 3 - Cited by 19 - Full Document

Shri Brij Bhushan Singla vs Lic Of India, New Delhi on 4 February, 2010

TheseAppeals have been filed against the judgement & order dated 23.9.2013 passed by the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Shahjahanpur in Complaint Case No. 69 of 2011,  Brij Bhushan Lal vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India. Appeal No 2440 of 2013 has been filed by Life Insurance Corporation of  India, Divisional office Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Kanpur, through Secretary (Legal), Zonal Office Legal Cell, 30 Hazratganj, Lucknow. In this Appeal Brij Bhushan Lal and Committee of Management, Arya Mahila P.G.College, Shahjahanpur are the respondents. The Appeal No. 2871 of 2013 has been filed by Committee of Management, Arya Mahila P.G.College, Shahjahanpur where in Life Insurance Company and 2 others are the respondents. Since both these appeals are connected and against the one impugned order dated 23.9.2013, hence these are being decided by this judgement. The Appeal 2440 will be the leading case.
Central Information Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1