Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.18 seconds)Mafatlal Industries Ltd. And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 19 December, 1996
7. Reference is also made to the Judgment of the Division Bench of
the Delhi High Court in Umang Realtech (P.) Ltd v. Union of India [2024]
162 taxmann.com 817 (Delhi) and in Anhad Impex and another Vs.
Assistance Commissioner [2024] SCC Online Delhi 1135, to which one of
us (Sanjeev Sachdeva J.) was a party, wherein in similar circumstances, the
Judgments of the Madras High Court have been relied upon to hold
insufficiency of service of show cause notice and violation of principles of
natural justice.
Prime Impex Limited And Anr. vs Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial ... on 29 September, 2000
7. Reference is also made to the Judgment of the Division Bench of
the Delhi High Court in Umang Realtech (P.) Ltd v. Union of India [2024]
162 taxmann.com 817 (Delhi) and in Anhad Impex and another Vs.
Assistance Commissioner [2024] SCC Online Delhi 1135, to which one of
us (Sanjeev Sachdeva J.) was a party, wherein in similar circumstances, the
Judgments of the Madras High Court have been relied upon to hold
insufficiency of service of show cause notice and violation of principles of
natural justice.
East Coast Constructions & Industries ... vs Assistant Commissioner (St) on 25 June, 2019
4. Reference may be had to the judgment of the High Court of Madras
in W.P. No.26457/2023, titled East Coast Constructions and Industries Ltd.
v. Assistant Commissioner (ST) dated 11.09.2023 /[2023] 157 taxmann.com
66/(2023) 13 Centax 41 (Mad.), wherein the High Court of Madras has
noticed that communications are placed under the heading of "View Notices
and Orders" and "View Additional Notices and Orders". The Madras High
Court had directed the respondents to address the issue arising out of posting
of information under two separate headings. As per the petitioner, the Menu
"View Additional Notices and Orders" were under the heading of "User
Services" and not under the heading "View Notices and Orders".
M/S Satyam Shivam Papers Pvt. Ltd. vs Asst. Commissioner St And 4 Others on 2 June, 2021
5. This issue is further highlighted by another judgment of the Madras
High Court dated 31.07.2023 in W.P. No.22369/2023 Sabari Infra (P.) Ltd.
v. Asstt. Commissioner (ST) [2023] 154 taxmann.com 147/(2023) 10 Centax
92 (Mad.) connected petitions, wherein the Madras High Court has noticed
as under :-
1