Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.30 seconds)

Life Insurance Corporation Of India & ... vs Smt.Asha Goel & Anr on 13 December, 2000

LIC and others Vs. Asha Goel 2001-02-Sec.-107 first appeal no.242 of 2006 decided on 27.07.2006. It is further case is that the complainant filed a copy of Ration Card, Voter list and voter card of the insured to prove the case that Kalo Devi was not at 46 years of her age despite Insurance was done and therefore nowshe was not able to get the death claim.  The opposite parties have filed separate written statement stating therein that they had only forwarded thedeath claim to the opposite parties no.1&2 Reliance Life Insurance Company Ltd. On 04.06.2013 and thereafter prays that they may be expunged from the name of the party. Opposite parties no.4 has also files a separate written statement and submitted that there was no relationship between them and Reliance Life Insurance Company Ltd.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 333 - D P Mohapatra - Full Document

Satwant Kaur Sandhu vs New India Assurance Company Ltd on 10 July, 2009

3.                    After notice opposite parties appeared and filed written statement separately stating therein that the claim of the complainant wasbased on the policy which was void-ab-initio; invalid and unforceable. It was further submitted that insuredmis-leading by claming her age as 46 years whereas she was actually 56 years of her age at the time of taking Insurance. His further stated that due to concealment of her age by the insured, the complaint is liable to be dismissed. There was no deficiency in service  on the part of the opposite parties no.1 &2. They have relied upon the various cases  (i). Satwant Kaur Sandhu Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., 2009 CTJ 956. (ii).
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 608 - D K Jain - Full Document
1