Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.33 seconds)Section 15 in The Trade And Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 483 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 486 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 342 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 15 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
The Trade Marks Act, 1999
Section 96 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Emperor vs Chhotalal Amarchand on 1 September, 1936
In Emperor v. Chhotalal Amarchand AIR 1937 Bom. 1 (FB) their Lordships of the Bombay High Court have laid down that the test is whether there is such a similarity in the trade mark, label and general get-up as might mislead an ordinary purchaser who would not be likely to notice the differences or attach importance to them. Applying this test to the present case I have no hesitation in holding that the respondent has marked his goods in a manner reasonably calculated to deceive any unwary purchaser and to cause him to believe that the goods are the manufacture of Messrs Pratab Mull Gobind Ram of 119 Khengrapatti Street, Calcutta.