Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.28 seconds)

D.Velusamy vs D.Patchaiammal on 21 October, 2010

48. Similarly, when there is absolute lack of substantial chunk of material from the petitioner's-side to establish all the ingredients which are put-forth by the Hon'ble Apex Court of India in it's precedent law by way of judicial pronouncement as highlighted herein before supra under a citation reported in 2010 AIR SCW 6731 (relevant-paras 33 to 35), in a case between D. Velusamy Vs. D. Patchaimmal and the provisions of Sections 2(a), 36 Crl.Appeal No.185/2014 2(f) & 2(s), ultimately the urge endeavored to put-forth by the petitioner against the respondent No.1 to seek the reliefs as sought-for in the main-petition before the trial court as-well-as before the instant court, do-not come within the intra-vires ambitual purview of the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 210 - M Katju - Full Document
1   2 Next