Rajalekshmi Motor Service, Kozhikode vs Govt. Of Kerala And Ors. on 1 December, 1959
7. The view taken by the learned single Judge is certainly a plausible one. We may also state that even if two views are possible in the matter, it cannot be said that the view adopted by the learned single Judge is "perverse". On this reasoning also, no interference is called for in the Writ Appeal -- See Neelakanta Kartha v. Registrar 1978 Ker LT 408 & Rajalekshmi Motor Service v. Govt. of Kerala, 1959 Ker LJ 1425 at p. 1430 para 14: (AIR 1960 Ker 229 at p. 231 para 14).