Satish Kumar vs Gnct Of Delhi & Anr. on 22 May, 2013
3. The relevant facts of the case are that in response to the
advertisement of 2009, the applicant applied for the post of SI (Ex.)
under the "Departmental UR category". The applicant, having qualified
in the physical endurance and measurement test, he appeared for
written test and he qualified in the written test and appeared for the
interview as well. The applicant had secured 161 marks, whereas the
cut off of marks for the "Departmental UR category" was 163 marks
and as he had secured less mark, he was declared disqualified in the
final result. Some of the similarly situated candidates who had secured
159 and 156 marks had filed OAs and ultimately they were appointed
in subsequent lists prepared in the "open/ UR category", by virtue of
the judgment dated 22.08.2013 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of
Delhi in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 5220/2012, titled Rajender Singh Vs.
Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. The applicant after the said judgment
in Rajender Singh's case filed this OA contending that he should have
been considered under "open/ UR category".