Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.28 seconds)
Md. Imtiyaz Alam vs State Of Jharkhand on 5 September, 2018 cites

Shrikant Anandrao Bhosale vs State Of Maharashtra on 26 September, 2002

though these witnesses have denied the suggestion that the accused was suffering from any mental illness. Learned counsel has placed reliance upon the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Srikant Anandrao Bhosale Vs. State of Maharashtra, reported in (2002) 7 SCC 748, as also upon the decisions of this High Court in the State of Jharkhand Vs. Lakhan Rai, reported in 2007 Cri L J 2410 (Jhar) and in the State of Jharkhand Vs. Madras Nayak, reported in 2003 (1) East Cr C 607 (Jhr), in support his contention that if the accused is found to be mentally ill at the time of occurrence, he is entitled to the benefit of Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code. Placing reliance on these decisions, learned counsel submitted that taking into consideration his mental illness, the accused-appellant was entitled to the benefit of Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code, and he ought to have been acquitted of the charge.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 86 - H K Sema - Full Document

State Of Jharkhand vs Lakhan Rai on 16 October, 2006

though these witnesses have denied the suggestion that the accused was suffering from any mental illness. Learned counsel has placed reliance upon the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Srikant Anandrao Bhosale Vs. State of Maharashtra, reported in (2002) 7 SCC 748, as also upon the decisions of this High Court in the State of Jharkhand Vs. Lakhan Rai, reported in 2007 Cri L J 2410 (Jhar) and in the State of Jharkhand Vs. Madras Nayak, reported in 2003 (1) East Cr C 607 (Jhr), in support his contention that if the accused is found to be mentally ill at the time of occurrence, he is entitled to the benefit of Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code. Placing reliance on these decisions, learned counsel submitted that taking into consideration his mental illness, the accused-appellant was entitled to the benefit of Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code, and he ought to have been acquitted of the charge.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 3 - A Sahay - Full Document
1   2 Next