Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.26 seconds)Pt.Chet Ram Vashist vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 26 October, 1994
In Pt. Chet Ram Vashist v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi, their Lordships have held that, after sanctioning a plan and approved lay-out no condition be imposed asking the allottees to transfer the open space reserved in favour of the Corporation free of costs. Their Lordships have further held that, such condition would amount to transfer of ownership of the site to the Corporation free of cost which is not permissible in law. According to them when any site is reserved for such public purpose, Corporation only gets a right as custodian to manage the same but it cannot acquire any right, title or interest thereof.
Bangalore Medical Trust vs B.S. Muddappa And Ors on 19 July, 1991
In Bangalore Medical Trust v. B. S. Muddappa, their Lordships have held that,
"A Development Scheme, therefore, sanctioned and published in the gazette could not be altered by the Government."
The Divisional Manager, Advances ... vs Angeline Devadoss And Anr. on 12 April, 1997
In such circumstances, as rightly observed by this Court in The Divisional Manager, Advances Section II. Circle Office, Canara Bank v. Angellne Devadoss, 1998 (1) Mad LW 586, the very approach before the Forum when the matter was pending before this Court can only be subject to the ultimate order to be passed by this Court, hence the said contention is liable to be rejected.
Sengunthar Trust vs Bangalore Development Authority And ... on 25 November, 1992
In Sengunthar Trust v. Bangalore Development Authority, 1993 (1) SCC 672 : (1993 AIR SCW 566) their Lordships have observed that at page 566. of AIR SCW :
1