Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.19 seconds)Section 118 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 109 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Ram Prasad vs Hari Narain And Ors. on 1 August, 1997
18. Even in Ram Prasad v. Hari Narain (supra), cited by Shri Rajesh Kapoor), this Court observed as under:-
Section 110 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Kailashi Devi vs Matadeen Agrawal And Ors. on 23 April, 2001
17. This Court in Kailashi Devi v. Maladeen Agrawal (supra) after having placed reliance on various decisions referred to therein held that the power of attorney is competent witness and is entitled to appear as such; his statements in the court cannot be ignored nor can be held that his stalernent shall not be read in evidence only because of me reasons that he had appeared as a power of attorney and in case the parties to suit (plaintiff or defendant) do not choose to appear as a witness in witness box, it cannot be said that the his evidence (power of attorney holder's who appeared in the capacity as a holder of power attorney) is not lobe read at all.