Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (1.58 seconds)Section 21 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 [Entire Act]
The Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974
The Customs Act, 1962
Ibrahim Bachu Bafan & Anr Etc vs State Of Gujarat & Ors on 12 February, 1985
Their Lordships also distinguished Ibrahim Bachu Bafan v. State of Gujarat, as a decision restricted to Section 11(2) and as not an authority for purposes of Section 11(1). Therefore reliance for the petitioner on these three cases last mentioned is impermissible.
State Of Maharashtra & Another vs Smt. Sushila Mafatlal Shah & Others on 7 September, 1988
So far as the decisions of the Supreme Court in Santosh Anand's case, and in Pushpa's case, , are concerned, they have already been held to be per incuriam in Sushila Mafatlal Shah's case, .
Smt. Pushpa vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 31 May, 1979
So far as the decisions of the Supreme Court in Santosh Anand's case, and in Pushpa's case, , are concerned, they have already been held to be per incuriam in Sushila Mafatlal Shah's case, .