Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.35 seconds)
U.P. Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd vs Union Of India & Ors on 6 November, 2015 cites

Oil And Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. vs Collector Of Customs And Central Excise on 16 July, 2007

24. We may however observe that though the Supreme Court in Electronics Corporation of India Ltd. supra has withdrawn the directions issued in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise but for the reason of finding that the same were not serving any purpose and were merely delaying the adjudication of the disputes inter se Government Departments and Public Sector Enterprises and which were ultimately landing in the Courts.
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Electronics Corp.Of India Limited vs Union Of India & Ors on 17 February, 2011

24. We may however observe that though the Supreme Court in Electronics Corporation of India Ltd. supra has withdrawn the directions issued in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise but for the reason of finding that the same were not serving any purpose and were merely delaying the adjudication of the disputes inter se Government Departments and Public Sector Enterprises and which were ultimately landing in the Courts.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 74 - Full Document

Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Limited vs City And Industrial Development ... on 28 July, 2004

(B) that PMA was set up independent of and prior to the mechanism of Committee of Disputes which was made effective by virtue of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Vs. Collector of Central Excise and Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Vs. City and Industrial Development Corporation, Maharashtra supra;
Bombay High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 14 - V G Palshikar - Full Document

M/S S.B.P. & Co vs M/S Patel Engineering Ltd. & Anr on 26 October, 2005

14. The appellant having not pressed the challenge to the arbitration on the grounds of limitation and of excluding the applicability of the Arbitration Act, cannot in this appeal urge the same. Even otherwise, it is the settled position in law (see S.B.P. & Co. Vs. Patel Engineering Ltd. (2005) 8 SCC 618 and Lalit-Kumar V. Sanghavi Vs. Dharamdas V. Sanghavi (2014) 7 SCC 255) that a writ petition with respect to arbitration proceedings does not lie.
Supreme Court of India Cites 68 - Cited by 120 - P K Balasubramanyan - Full Document

M/S Steel Authority Of India Ltd. vs Engineers Project India Ltd on 7 November, 2014

22. Though the counsel for the appellant has not argued, we may record that the question, whether the provisions of the Arbitration Act are applicable to the arbitration aforesaid, is not relevant at this stage and the occasion therefor may arise at a subsequent stage. It may however be observed that Section 2(2),(4) & (5) of the Arbitration Act provides that the part thereof relating to domestic arbitration applies where the place of arbitration is in India, save as otherwise provided in any law. It may further be observed that this Court in Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. Engineers Project India Ltd. MANU/DE/2793/2014 reiterated by me in Order dated LPA No.760/2014 Page 11 of 13 18th September, 2015 in W.P.(C) No.6591/2015 titled Rakesh Kumar Garg Vs. DSE Financial Service Ltd. has held that there is no provision in Arbitration Act that proscribes a two tier arbitration procedure.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 3 - V Bakhru - Full Document
1   2 Next