Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.39 seconds)

Manipal Academy Of Higher Education (A ... vs State Of Karnataka And Others Etc. on 22 July, 1994

C/W STRP No.36 of 2025 that the University had an independent intention to conduct business through these connected, incidental, or ancillary activities. Consequently, the burden always remained on the Revenue to prove that the University carried on business in such activities. This burden has not been discharged by the appellant-State, which relies solely on the contention that the prospectus were sold at a higher price. The mere sale of prospectus at a higher price, without considering the University's explanation that the fee charged is composite in nature, cannot satisfy the requirement set out in paragraph 21 of Manipal University (supra).
Karnataka High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 Next