Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.17 seconds)The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Saurabh Kumar Shukla vs Hukum Chand And Ors. on 29 September, 1997
6. Counsel for the insurance company submitted that the words "privation of member" are confined to Section 142 of the Act, i.e., for interim compensation, but while determining final compensation, Court has to record its finding from the evidence on record. If the claimant has proved permanent disability in the evidence or the percentage of permanent partial disability, then the claimant is entitled for compensation on account of permanent or partial disability. Counsel for the insurance company submitted that the later judgment in the case of Mool Chand (supra) is the correct judgment, whereas earlier judgment in the case of Saurabh Kumar Shukla (supra) is limited to Section 142 of the Act.
Section 4 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Mool Chand vs S.S. Parihar And Ors. on 5 March, 1998
6. Counsel for the insurance company submitted that the words "privation of member" are confined to Section 142 of the Act, i.e., for interim compensation, but while determining final compensation, Court has to record its finding from the evidence on record. If the claimant has proved permanent disability in the evidence or the percentage of permanent partial disability, then the claimant is entitled for compensation on account of permanent or partial disability. Counsel for the insurance company submitted that the later judgment in the case of Mool Chand (supra) is the correct judgment, whereas earlier judgment in the case of Saurabh Kumar Shukla (supra) is limited to Section 142 of the Act.
1