Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 41 (0.71 seconds)Section 76 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
The Limitation Act, 1963
Government of India Act, 1935
Section 108 in Government of India Act, 1935 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
National Sewing Thread Co. Ltd vs James Chadwick & Bros. Ltd.(J.& P. Coats ... on 7 May, 1953
32. Whatever doubt could have been raised in the decision in the National Sewing Thread Co. Ltd v. James Chadwick & Bros.
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Upadhyaya Hargovind Devshanker vs Dhirendrasinh Virbhadrasinhji ... on 17 February, 1988
45. The Supreme Court in Upadhyaya's case, , had been considering a case as to whether an L.P.A. lies to a Division Bench from an interlocutory order passed by a single Judge. In that case, it was held that the High Court while adjudicating upon an election dispute exercises its special jurisdiction conferred by virtue of Article 329 (b) of the Constitution and having regard to the historic legislations and the limited extent of an appeal expressly provided by Section 116-A of the said Act, it was held that the right to prefer a Letters Patent is barred by necessary implication. Such is not the case here.
Jaimangal Ltd. Avantee Hotel And Anr. vs State Of Bihar And Ors. on 8 March, 1989
47. So far as the cases of this Court in Jaimangal v. State 1989 BBC 245 and Naya Dawakhana v. State 1989 BBCJ 2S3, arc concerned the same have no application in the facts and circumstances of this case. In these cases, it was merely held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act has no application in an appeal before the statutory authorities.