Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)

Iqbal Singh Marwah & Anr vs Meenakshi Marwah & Anr on 11 March, 2005

5. The learned counsel for the appellant on the strength of the decision of the Apex court reported in Iqbal Singh Marwah and another Vs. Meenakshi Marwah and another (2005(4) SCC 370) and Rugmini Ammal (Dead) by LRs. Vs. V.Narayana Reddiar and others (2007(12) SCC 611) submitted that the appellant herein left with no remedy other than by filing an 7 Crl.A.No.2138 of 2011 appeal as contemplated under Section 341 of Cr.P.C. It is also the submission of the learned counsel that the above two decisions which relied on by the appellant are rendered by the Constitutional Bench. According to the learned counsel in this appeal, this Court is bound to follow the same and the appeal is to be considered on merit. I am unable to sustain the above contention.
Supreme Court of India Cites 49 - Cited by 822 - G P Mathur - Full Document

Surendra Gupta vs Bhawan Devi (Smt) And Another on 5 April, 1994

In the light of the decision in Surendra Gupta's case, the right of an accused or a person against whom an order under Section 341 or 342 is passed, will be accrued only when a complaint is actually filed. The decision cited by the learned counsel for the appellant are not directly on the point and the dictums laid down in the above decisions do not confer any right on a person against whom an order is 8 Crl.A.No.2138 of 2011 passed under Section 340 Sub Section (1) or Sub Section (2) of Section 340 of Cr.P.C. Therefore, the present appeal is not maintainable at the instance of the appellant.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 7 - R M Sahai - Full Document
1