Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.67 seconds)

Sarla Sirohi vs State Of Raj. & Ors on 25 August, 2010

2. During the course of arguments, it has been pointed out that a Division Bench of this Court in the case of D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16572/2018 (Anita & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) has set aside the rule requiring not more than two children for appointment vide judgment and order dated 2nd April, 2019. Once the Rule 9A of the Rajasthan Municipalities (Safai Employees Service) Rules, 2012 has been declared ultra vires, the concerned stipulation in the advertisement would also be deemed to have been deleted. Any affidavit filed with regard to the said stipulation, therefore, will have to be treated as having become redundant.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 38 - Cited by 468 - V Kothari - Full Document

Ravindra Kumar Misra vs U.P. State Handloom Corporation Ltd. & ... on 15 October, 1987

4. We also notice that the learned Single Judge has relied on the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India & Ors. Reported in AIR 2016 SC 3598, which has also been later on (Uploaded on 05/05/2026 at 04:55:51 PM) (Downloaded on 05/05/2026 at 10:00:44 PM) [2026:RJ-JD:21045] (6 of 6) [CW-16100/2021] reiterated in the case of Ravindra Kumar Vs. State of U.P. reported in [(2024) 5 SCC 264].
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 98 - M Rangnath - Full Document

Jodhpur Municipal Corporation, ... vs Madan Lal on 7 September, 2022

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that against the order dated 08.07.2020 allowing writ petitions preferred by Madan Lal and others, the respondent Municipal Corporation preferred intra- court appeal, being DBSAW No.371/2020 : Jodhpur Municipal Corporation v. Madan Lal & Anr. and other connected appeals, which appeals were dismissed by Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.12.2025.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1