Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.33 seconds)
State Of Chhattisgarh vs Radhe Shyam Kori on 3 February, 2022 cites

B.Jayaraj vs State Of A.P on 28 March, 2014

"7. Insofar as the offence under Section 7 is concerned, it is a settled position in law that demand of illegal gratification is sine qua non to constitute the said offence and mere recovery of currency notes cannot constitute the offence under Section 7 unless it is proved beyond all reasonable doubt that the accused voluntarily accepted the money knowing it to be a bribe. The above position has been succinctly laid down in several judgments of this Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 511 - R Gogoi - Full Document

Krishna Ram And Others vs State Of Rajasthan on 4 September, 1992

21. The case law relied upon by learned counsel for the appellant in Krishna Ram (supra) is on different facts. In the aforementioned rulings, currency note which was given by Police to complainant to satisfy demand was seized from the pocket of bush-shirt of accused person. In that fact of the case and evidence therein, Hon'ble Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against conviction.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 24 - G N Ray - Full Document
1   2 Next