Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.19 seconds)Section 325 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Ghurey Lal vs State Of U.P on 30 July, 2008
"In Ghurey Lal v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2008) 10 SCC 450, a
two Judge Bench of this Court of which one of us (Bhandari, J.)
VISHNU
2015.10.06 10:18
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
High Court Chandigarh
CRM-M-34470-2010 (O&M) -6-
was a member had an occasion to deal with most of the cases
referred in this judgment. This Court provided guidelines for the
Appellate Court in dealing with the cases in which the trial courts
have acquitted the accused. The following principles emerge from
the cases above:
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of Rajasthan vs Naresh @ Ram Naresh on 26 August, 2009
40. This Court in a recently delivered judgment State of
Rajasthan v. Naresh @ Ram Naresh 2009 (11) SCALE 699
again examined judgments of this Court and laid down that
"An order of acquittal should not be lightly interfered with
even if the court believes that there is some evidence
pointing out the finger towards the accused. This Court has
dealt with the scope of interference with an order of
acquittal in a number of cases."
State Of Haryana vs Aman Kumar And Another on 9 December, 2010
The law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Arulvelu's
case (supra) has also been followed by a Division Bench of this Court in the
case of State of Haryana v. Aman Kumar and another 2012 (3) RCR (Crl.)
Baljeet Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 2 November, 2012
330 and judgment dated 2.11.2012 passed by this Court in CRM-A- 284-MA-
2011 (Baljeet Singh v. State of Punjab and others).
1