Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 52 (0.33 seconds)The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 306 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Ramesh Kumar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 17 October, 2001
A word uttered in the fit of anger or emotion without
intending the consequences to actually follow cannot be
said to be instigation. [Ramesh Kumar vs. State of
Chhatisgarh, (2001) 9 SCC 618]
Article 26 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Munnu Raja & Anr vs The Stae Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 November, 1975
23. Dying declaration can be made any time, in the
presence of anyone. It need not to be a Doctor, a
Government Officer or an Executive Magistrate. So long as
the victim is aware and fully conscious of what is being
done and said, any statement made by her can be treated
as an evidence, it being a different matter, as to whether it
requires corroboration or not. (See: Munnu Raja and another
v. The State of Madhya Pradesh, (1976) 3 SCC 104;
Ramawati Devi vs State Of Bihar on 5 January, 1983
Ramawati Devi v. State of Bihar, (1983) 1 SCC 211).
Sethu Madhavan Nair & Ors vs The State Of Kerala on 9 August, 1974
258, and (8) Sethu Madhavan Nair v. State of
Kerala, (1975) 3 SCC 150."
Jaishree Anant Khandekar vs State Of Maharashtra on 23 March, 2009
In Jaishree Anant Khandekar vs. State of
Maharashtra, (2009) 11 SCC 647, a comparative study of
laws of various countries on the point of dying declaration
was done by the Apex Court. It was held that:
Kishan Lal vs State Of Rajasthan on 17 August, 1999
26. This Court in Kishan Lal Vs.
State of Rajasthan, AIR 1999 SC 3062,
.