Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 47 (0.38 seconds)

State Of Maharashtra vs Champalal Punjaji Shah on 12 August, 1981

b) Where the accused had been acquitted on ground of delay in conducting trial, which delay was attributable not to the tardiness or indifference of the prosecuting agencies, but to the conduct of the accused himself; or where accused had been acquitted on ground of delay in conducting trial relating to an offence which is not of a trivial nature. [State of Maharashtra v. Champalal Punjaji Shah, (1981) 3 SCC 610 : AIR 1981 SC 1675] [Source : Durga Das Basu - "The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973"
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 77 - O C Reddy - Full Document

Babu vs State Of Kerala on 11 August, 2010

"16. When the findings of fact recorded by a court can be held to be perverse has been dealt with and considered in para 20 of the aforesaid decision, which reads as under : (Babu case [Babu v. State of Kerala, (2010) 9 SCC 189 : (2010) 3 SCC (Cri) 1179] , SCC p. 199) "20. The findings of fact recorded by a court can be held to be perverse if the findings have been arrived at by ignoring or excluding relevant material or by taking into consideration irrelevant/inadmissible material. The finding may also be said to be perverse if it is "against the weight of evidence", or if the finding so outrageously defies logic as to suffer from the vice of irrationality.
Supreme Court of India Cites 43 - Cited by 492 - B S Chauhan - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next