Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.40 seconds)
Dilip S/O. Sudam Karale vs The State Of Maharashtra on 3 May, 2019 cites

Kiran Kumar vs State Of M.P. on 18 January, 2006

A] In the case of Kiran Kumar Vs State of MP (2001) 9 Supreme Court Cases 211 the appellant was convicted under Sections 460,376,325 and 506 of the IPC. The maximum sentence imposed on him was imprisonment for a period of 7 years on the second count. His application for suspension of sentence was rejected by the High Court. It was held that no exceptional reason had been shown in the impugned order for not suspending the sentence. The sentence recorded against the appellant was suspended during pendency of the appeal and he was directed to be released on bail.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 125 - Full Document

Angana & Anr vs State Of Rajasthan on 6 February, 2009

B] In the Case of Angana and Another Vs State of Rajasthan (2009) 3 Supreme Court Cases 767 the Hon'ble Apex Court considered the aspect of suspension of sentence pending appeal and release of appellant on bail and further held that when an appeal is preferred against the conviction in the High Court, the High Court has ample power and discretion to suspend the sentence, but that discretion has to be exercised judiciously depending on the facts and circumstances of each case. While considering the suspension of sentence, each case is to be considered on the basis of nature of the offence, manner in which occurrence had taken place, whether in any manner bail granted ::: Uploaded on - 03/05/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 04/05/2019 07:19:55 ::: (6) criapln3725.18 earlier had been misused. In fact, there is no straitjacket formula which can be applied in exercising the discretion. The facts and circumstances of each case will govern the exercise of judicial discretion.
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 112 - Full Document
1   2 Next