Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.44 seconds)

Mcdermott International Inc vs Burn Standard Co. Ltd. & Ors on 12 May, 2006

Be that as it may, this Court in the said judgment did not have benefit of the judgment of Supreme Court in case of Indian Farmers Fertilizer Co-operative Limited (supra) and in case of Mcdermott International Inc. (supra). The said judgment relied upon by the learned senior counsel for the respondent is thus clearly distinguishable in the facts of this case and would not assist the case of the respondent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 48 - Cited by 1325 - S B Sinha - Full Document

M/S Indian Farmers Fertilizer Co ... vs M/S Bhadra Products on 23 January, 2018

33. Learned senior counsel for the respondent made an attempt to distinguish the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Indian Farmers Fertilizer Co-operative Limited Vs. Bhadra Products (supra) on the ground that in that matter, the learned arbitrator had decided the issue finally at the interim stage by rendering partial final award. The said judgment of the Supreme Court is thus distinguishable in the facts of this case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 41 - Cited by 65 - R F Nariman - Full Document

Satwant Singh Sodhi vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 26 March, 1999

In so far as the judgment of Supreme Court in case of State of Rajasthan & Anr. (supra) relied upon by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner (original respondent) is concerned, the Supreme Court in the said judgment had considered the matter under the provisions of Arbitration Act, 1940. Be that as it may, the learned arbitrator under Section 31(7) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has powers to award interest at such rate as it deems reasonable on the whole or any part of the money, for the whole or any part of the period between the date on which the cause of action arose and on the date on which the award is made, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. However, under Section 31(7)(a), the learned arbitrator is empowered to award the interest at such rate as it deems reasonable.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 23 - S R Babu - Full Document

Gail (India) Limited vs Punj Lloyd Limited on 8 May, 2017

70. Learned senior counsel distinguished the judgment of the Delhi High Court in the case of Gail (India) Limited Vs. Punj Lloyd Limited (supra) on the ground that in that matter, the facts before the Delhi High Court were different. Leaned senior counsel submits that there is no dispute about the proposition of law that the learned arbitrator ::: Uploaded on - 21/01/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 22/01/2020 02:29:35 ::: ppn 35 arbp-977.16 wt 978.16.doc has power to interpret the terms of the contract and if such interpretation is possible interpretation, the same cannot be substituted by another possible interpretation. He submits that in this case, learned arbitrator has awarded claim based only on assumption and not based on the evidence or by interpretation of terms of the contract.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next