Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.02 seconds)
K.G.Jilendran vs Mohideen Andavar Dharga And on 3 August, 2017 cites

Lal Shah Baba Dargah Trust vs Magnum Developers And Others on 15 December, 2015

In this connection the Apex Court in the decision reported in AIR 2016 SC 381 [Lal Shah Baba Dargah Trust vs. Magnum Developers] has held that by virtue of the amendment, the composition of the Tribunal has been enlarged and further, it has also been duly held that the amendment has been introduced only for making improvements in the functioning of the Tribunal with the help of the two more members in the Tribunal and further, it has also been held that till the Tribunal as contemplated under the amendment is constituted, one member Tribunal will continue to exercise the jurisdiction as done at present and so holding it has held that the one member Tribunal exercising jurisdiction shall not cease to exist even though the new Tribunal as contemplated under the Amendment Act has not been constituted by the Government. In the above decision, the Apex Court has further held as follows:
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 21 - Full Document

I.Salam Khan vs The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board on 31 January, 2005

Further, according to him, considering the scope of the issues involved in this lis, particularly, as to the determination of the character of the property involved in the matter whether it is a waqf property or not as raised by the first respondent, according to him, even prior to the amendment brought into the Act with effect from 01.11.2013, in the light of the above said issue also, the Wakf Tribunal has the jurisdiction and competency to entertain the lis and in this connection, he placed reliance upon the decisions reported in 2005-1-L.W.676 [I.Salam Khan vs. The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board rep.by its Chairman and others] and (2006) 4 MLJ 1800 [V.S.B.Sikkandar vs. K.M.Khader Gani and another].
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 43 - Full Document
1   2 Next