Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)Sodan Singh vs N.D.M.C. & Ors on 4 February, 1998
16. Learned senior counsel for the contractor, Mr. Rajiv Shakdhar supported submissions of the MCD so far as vesting of public streets in the Corporation is concerned; he also relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Sodan Singh v. NDMC and contended that Municipal Corporations have the primary duty to regulate flow of movement on public streets. In furtherance of this objective, it is open to the Corporation to grant limited rights to such as Tehbazari etc. The use of a public roads for the purpose of parking would fall within that category. He also submitted that the bid of the contractor was made on 4.5.2005 and accepted in November 2005. The petitioners knew about the contract and deliberately chose to approach the Court much later.
Section 298 in The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Delhi Police Act, 1978 [Entire Act]
Municipal Board, Hapur Etc vs Jassa Singh & Ors. Etc on 4 September, 1996
14. Learned Counsel for the MCD relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court reported as Municipal Board, Hapur v. Jassa Singh Civil Appeal No. 42/1980 decided on 4th September, 1996 for the proposition the primary responsibility of the corporation is to provide public amenities such as parking lots, bus stops and public conveniences.
Section 29 in The Delhi Police Act, 1978 [Entire Act]
1