Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.29 seconds)
M/S Govind Sugar Mills Limited vs The Union Of India & Ors on 22 December, 2008 cites

Sangam Spinners vs Regional Provident Fund ... on 4 December, 2007

As regards the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of I.R. Coelho (supra) is concerned, it has no bearing at all. In the said case, the question was as to whether an act included the ninth schedule, whether its provision would be open to attack on the ground that it destroys or damages the basic structure of the Constitution. The Supreme Court held that an Act, affecting the basic structure of the Constitution, though included in the ninth schedule is not immune from attack on that ground. There is no such issue in the present case and, as such, the decision relied on has no bearing in the facts and circumstances of the case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 24 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Bileshwar Khan Udyog Khedut Shahakari vs V.Union Of India And Another on 10 February, 1999

It has lastly been contended on behalf of the petitioners that in case the petitioners have made excess realization, it was open for the Union of India to approach the court and obtain order for payment of interest. It has been pointed out that it is permissible for the court to direct payment of interest on excess realization but it is not permissible for the Parliament to make such law. It has been pointed out that such a course was adopted by the Union of India in the case of BILESHWAR KHAN UDYOG KHEDUT SHAHAKARI MANDALI LTD. AND OTHERS versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER (1999)2 Supreme Court Cases 518 and in that case interest was awarded. Our attention has been drawn to the following passage from paragraph 2 of the said judgment, which reads as follows :
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 15 - V N Khare - Full Document
1   2 3 Next