Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.37 seconds)
Smt. Gurmail Kaur Widow Of Late Shri Ram ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) (Through The ... on 20 March, 2008 cites

S.K.Mastan Bee vs The General Manager, South Central ... on 4 December, 2002

8. Objection of limitation in this case cannot be sustained because in the case of S.K. Mastan Bee v. General Manager reported in 2003 (1) SCSLJ 136, Hon'ble Supreme Court has already held if an amount is payable to the widow, who could not come to the court as she was illiterate or did not have the means to come to the court, the same cannot be denied on the specious plea of limitation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 144 - Full Document

Smt. Bhagwan Devi Etc. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 27 April, 2006

5. On merits, they have submitted that Shri Ram Lal was engaged as a casual labourer. Even though he was screened but he could not be regularized/absorbed against permanent vacancy for want of vacancy till his death on 8.10.1995. Rule 75 applies only to Railway Servants, therefore, this case is not covered under the Railway Service (Pension) Rules, 1993. Moreover, Larger Bench has already settled this issue in the case of Smt. Bhagwati Devi and Ors. v. U.O.I. and Ors. vide judgment dated 5.9.2007 (OA No. 1722/2005). Counsel for the respondents also submitted that Larger Bench has taken into consideration all the judgments on the point and then had decided it finally, therefore, any other judgment given by any other Bench of the Tribunal is of no relevance.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 5 - S Kumar - Full Document

S.S. Rathore vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 6 September, 1989

4. Respondents on the other hand have opposed this OA. They have submitted that this OA is barred by limitation. No representation has been received in the office of respondents. In any case repeated representations do not extent the period of limitation. They have relied on the judgments in the case of S.S. Rathore v. State of M.P. and R. C. Samantha v. U.O.I. 1993 (3) SC 1418.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 622 - M Rangnath - Full Document

Union Of India Ors vs Rabia Bikaner Etc on 7 July, 1997

but ultimately reliance was placed on the judgment given by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rabia Bikaner (Supra). The question posed in said case was 'whether the widow of a casual labourer in Railway Establishment, who died after putting in six month's service and obtaining the status of a temporary workman but before his appointment to a temporary post after screening is entitled to family pension under the 1964 Family Pension Scheme?'
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 33 - Full Document
1   2 Next