Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.21 seconds)
Suman Rohilla vs Govt. Of Nctd on 11 January, 2018 cites

Delhi Subordinate Services Selection ... vs Praveen Kumar on 11 November, 2016

It is also found that though the Hon‟ble Supreme Court of India, vide judgment dated 11.11.2016 passed in Civil Appeal No. 10824 of 2016 (arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 28948 of 2016) (Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board Vs. Praveen Kumar) set aside the said decisions of the Tribunal and of the Hon‟ble High Court, yet, in Review Petition ( C ) No. 486 of 2017 (in Civil Appeal No.10824) ( Praveen Kumar Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board), the Hon‟ble Supreme Court, vide judgment dated 20.9.2017, reviewed its judgment dated 11.11.2016(ibid) and upheld the said decisions of the Tribunal and of the Hon‟ble High Court, by substituting paragraphs 11 and 12 of the judgment dated 11.11.2016(ibid) for the following paragraphs:
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 10 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Praveen Kumar vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection ... on 20 September, 2017

"Once, we understand the contours and scope of the judgment, it becomes abundantly clear that the said judgment of the High Court in Sachin Gupta‟s case cannot be made applicable fo all times. The benefit of relaxation is given to those candidates who had completed the ETE course either in year 2006 or 2007 or 2008, to appear in the examination. Since the respondent completed the ETE course in year 2008 and pursuant thereto he appeared in the examination conducted in the year 2009, pursuant to an addendum to advertisement dated 11.12.2009, he was entitled to one-time relaxation in terms of Sachin Gupta‟s case. Therefore, his candidature was wrongly cancelled by the appellant. We, therefore, find no fault in the impugned judgment of the High Court.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1