Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.34 seconds)
Sachin Tomar vs State Of Haryana on 10 May, 2016 cites

Atul Anand And Another vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 27 March, 2014

4 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 13-05-2016 00:06:59 ::: CRM No. M-8831 of 2016 (O&M) 5 "I am further of the view that there has to be some evidence on record showing that after the release on bail, the petitioners are likely to come in association with any known criminal or their release on bail would expose them to moral, physical or psychological danger or that their release would defeat the ends of justice. In a given case if the parents of the petitioners are also criminals either exconvicts or members of a gang, it may be possible for the Court to refuse bail. Another example could be whether the petitioners have repeated the crime showing lapse on the part of the parents after their release while on bail, then the case may be covered by the exceptions carved out under Section 12 of the Act. However, in a case like the one in hand, where no material has been placed on record to show that the release of the 'juvenile in conflict with law' would defeat the ends of justice or any other exception, the petitioners cannot be denied the benefit of bail merely on the basis of conjectures or opinion formed by the prosecution or the Court. Reliance in this regard could be placed on the judgments in the case of Sahabuddin @ Shabboo's case (supra) and Sanjeev Kumar's case (supra)." For the reasons recorded above, the present petition is allowed.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 5 - M M Bedi - Full Document
1