Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.58 seconds)

M/S Nopany Investments (P) Ltd vs Santokh Singh (Huf) on 10 December, 2007

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Nopany Investments (supra) while dealing with a case of exemption from the Delhi (7 of 11) [CR-28/2017] Rent Control Act, 1958, based on the quantum of rent of the premises, as the revised rent of the premises crossed the threshold limit, it was held that the protection of the tenant under the Act automatically ceased to exist as the increase of rent agreed upon between the appellant landlord and the tenant brought the suit premises out of the purview of the Act. In the said case, though admittedly, at the time of letting out the premises the protection was available, on account of revision of rent the protection ceased to exist as the said aspect was only required to be examined at the time of filing of the application.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 764 - T Chatterjee - Full Document
1   2 Next